Novel cassette chromosome recombinases CcrA8B9 catalyse the excision and integration of the staphylococcal cassette chromosome <i>mec</i> element
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: A defining feature of MRSA is the SCCmec element. The excision and integration of SCCmec elements are catalysed by Ccr recombinases. Currently, seven ccrA, eight ccrB and two ccrC allotypes have been described. However, there have been no recent reports of a novel Ccr recombinase and thus this area should be explored. METHODS: According to the proposed criteria of the International Working Group on the Classification of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome Elements (IWG-SCC) committee, novel ccr genes were explored by searching the genome of our laboratory staphylococcal strains, which were isolated from bovine mastitis in Northwest China. The biological activity of the novel Ccr recombinases to excise and integrate SCCmec elements was determined. The distribution of the novel ccr genes in staphylococci was conducted by querying the NCBI nr/nt database. RESULTS: We report a set of novel Ccr recombinases CcrA8B9, which share nucleotide identities of 46.6%-50.2% and 47.4%-52.8% with the ccrA and ccrB alleles, respectively. We used PCR to show that CcrA8B9 can excise and integrate the SCCmec element. Furthermore, using NCBI BLAST we showed that the ccrA8B9 genes exist in other staphylococcal strains. Unlike the common ccr genes, ccrA8B9 is located outside the SCCmec/SCC element. CONCLUSIONS: The novel Ccr recombinases CcrA8B9 can help excise and integrate SCCmec/SCC from the genome and provide a new way to facilitate the transmission of SCCmec/SCC elements among staphylococci.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".