MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Motor Imagery Brain Activity Recognition through Data Augmentation using DC-GANs and Mu-Sigma

2022· article· en· W4310880288 on OpenAlex
Abhishek Khoyani, Harshdeep Kaur, Marzieh Amini, Hamidreza Sadreazami

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE Sensors · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsElectroencephalographyComputer scienceBrain–computer interfaceConvolutional neural networkArtificial intelligenceMotor imageryBrain activity and meditationDeep learningPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial neural networkSIGNAL (programming language)Speech recognitionNeurosciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The brain-computer interface is a technology that allows a machine to connect with the human brain and work based on the commands released by thoughts and activities of the brain. Electrodes are placed on the scalp and the changes in electric waves released by the brain are recorded as Electroencephalography (EEG) signals. In this work, we propose the use of generative adversarial networks and musigma methods to augment the EEG signals. Some of the existing deep learning methods such as convolutional neural network and recurrent neural network for classification of the EEG signals are implemented and their classification performance is examined with and without data augmentation. It is shown that the use of data augmentation can improve the performance of the EEG signal classification with deep learning models to a considerable extend.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.162
Threshold uncertainty score0.695

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.132
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it