MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

On the Predefined, Prescribed and Arbitrary Time Convergence

2022· article· en· W4310970477 on OpenAlex
Anil Kumar Pal, Shyam Kamal, B. Bandyopadhyay, Leonid Fridman

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIECON 2022 – 48th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvergence (economics)Stability (learning theory)Computer scienceControl (management)Management scienceArtificial intelligenceEngineeringEconomicsMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past few years, rated convergence has gained importance and has acquired tremendous interest from the research community. In this regard, some nomenclatures have emerged, broadly falling under the spectrum of finite time stability. However, these notions have certain aspects which differentiate them. Therefore it becomes imperative to bring out a comparative study among these notions. Moreover, such recent concepts are being applied to several application problems. Thus it is essential to understand even the small details associated with them. The purpose of the present paper is to address these objectives. In addition, the convergence of states and boundedness of the control in case of arbitrary time convergence has also been discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.665
Threshold uncertainty score0.879

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it