MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Enhanced Adaptive Higher Order Sliding Mode Observer based Sensorless Control

2022· article· en· W4310970676 on OpenAlexaff
Ying Zuo, Chunyan Lai, K. Lakshmi Varaha Iyer

Bibliographic record

VenueIECON 2022 – 48th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSensorless Control of Electric Motors
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Observer (physics)Fuzzy logicSliding mode controlComputer scienceState observerVariable (mathematics)Adaptive controlMode (computer interface)Fuzzy control systemControl engineeringControl (management)MathematicsEngineeringNonlinear systemArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The traditional higher order sliding mode observer (HSMO) based sensorless control strategy uses a constant gain. However, very large gain value can decrease the output accuracy, while very small gain value will degrade the sliding mode observer’s stability. Therefore, under uncertain disturbances, an adaptive gain should be set for the higher order sliding mode observer. This paper proposes a variable universe fuzzy adaptive high order sliding mode observer based sensorless control (VUF-HSMO) strategy for permanent magnet synchronous machines (PMSMs) to achieve high precision sensorless control. Firstly, fuzzy logic control technique is used to get an adaptive gain in the HSMO. Then, variable universe theory is employed to self-tune the universe of discourse according to the change of inputs, and this results in the improvement in position estimation accuracy. Experiment results under different conditions demonstrate the effectiveness and the superiority of the proposed VUF-HSMO based sensorless control compared with the traditional HSMO and fuzzy logic based HSMO.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIECON 2022 – 48th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics SocietySame topicSensorless Control of Electric MotorsFrench-language works237,207