MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4310975789 · doi:10.1101/2022.12.07.22283179

Regional genetic correlations highlight relationships between neurodegenerative diseases and the immune system

2022· preprint· en· W4310975789 on OpenAlexafffund
Frida Lona‐Durazo, Regina H. Reynolds, Sonja W. Scholz, Mina Ryten, Sarah A. Gagliano Taliun

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Heart Institute
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeMedical Research CouncilFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlliance de recherche numérique du CanadaInstitut de Valorisation des DonnéesNational Institutes of HealthUK Research and Innovation
KeywordsGenome-wide association studyDiseaseImmune systemAmyotrophic lateral sclerosisBiologyMultiple sclerosisExpression quantitative trait lociGenetic associationDementiaGeneticsImmunologySingle-nucleotide polymorphismMedicineGenotypeGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), Lewy body dementia (LBD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), are devastating complex diseases that result in a physical and psychological burden to patients and their families. There have been significant efforts to understand the genetic basis of neurodegenerative diseases resulting in the identification of disease risk-associated variants involved in several molecular mechanisms, including those that influence immune-related pathways. Regional genetic correlations, in contrast to genome-wide correlations, between pairs of immune and neurodegenerative traits have not been comprehensively explored, but such a regional assessment could shed light on additional immune-mediated risk-associated loci. Here, we systematically assessed the potential role of the immune system in five neurodegenerative diseases, by estimating regional genetic correlations between neurodegenerative diseases and immune-cell-derived single-cell expression quantitative trait loci (sc-eQTLs), using the recently developed method of Local Analysis of [co]Variant Association (LAVA). We used the most recently published genome-wide association studies (GWASes) for five neurodegenerative diseases and publicly available sc-eQTLs derived from 982 individuals from the OneK1K Consortium, capturing aspects of the innate and adaptive immune systems. Additionally, we tested GWASes from well-established immune-mediated diseases, Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), the immune-mediated neurodegenerative disease, multiple sclerosis (MS) and a well-powered GWAS with strong signal in the HLA region, schizophrenia (SCZ), as positive controls. Finally, we also performed regional genetic correlations between diseases and protein levels. We observed significant (FDR < 0.01) regional genetic correlations between sc-eQTLs and neurodegenerative diseases across 151 unique genes, spanning both the innate and adaptive immune systems, across most diseases tested (except for frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and LBD). Colocalization analyses on followed-up regional correlations highlighted immune-related candidate causal risk genes associated with neurodegenerative diseases. We also observed significant regional correlations with protein levels across 156 unique proteins, across all diseases tested, except for FTD. The outcomes of this study will improve our understanding of the immune component of neurodegeneration, which can be potentially used to repurpose existing immunotherapies used in clinical care for other immune-mediated diseases, to slow the progression of neurodegenerative diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→