Bibliographic record
Abstract
Communal military systems in the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Century Italy are largely based on personal compulsory corvées. Therefore, townsfolks mobilisation for military expeditions (Cavalcate) need to be enforced by some sort of sanction, of a nature and severity varying from Commune to Commune and according to circumstances. In Siena, thanks to thanks to extensive documentation, it can be observed how the Commune punished transgressors between XIII and 1287 with the Ghibelline government and from 1287 to 1355, the years of the Guelph government of the Nove. From the analysis of the documents, it is possible to measure the political meaning of the offense, treated differently by Ghibellini and Guelphs, the economic impact that the fines had for offenders. It was with the government of the Nove that the first military justice organs were created, functional to the policies of the regime. With the crisis of the government of the Nine, we are witnessing a slow but progressive decrease in the offense towards the middle of the fourteenth century, attributable to the increasingly important use of mercenary troops.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".