MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310990172 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-hfxtx

CO2-mineralization and carbonation reactor rig: design and validation for in situ neutron scattering experiments - Engineering and Lessons Learned

2022· preprint· en· W4310990172 on OpenAlexaff
A Mortazavi, Fu Song, Michael Michael Dudman, Michael J. Evans, Robert Copcutt, Giovanni Romanelli, F. Demmel, David H. Farrar, Stewart F. Parker, Kun Tian, Devis Di Tommaso, Gregory A. Chass

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaMcMaster University
FundersScience and Technology Facilities Council
KeywordsCarbonationMaterials scienceNeutronChemical engineeringAqueous solutionNuclear engineeringProcess engineeringChemistryNuclear physicsEngineeringComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CO2 mineralization via aqueous Mg/Ca/Na-carbonate (MgCO3/CaCO3/Na2CO3) formation represents a huge opportunity for the utilization of captured CO2. However, large-scale mineralization is hindered by slow kinetics due to the highly hydrated character of the cations in aqueous solutions (Mg2+ in particular). Reaction conditions can be optimized to accelerate carbonation kinetics, for example by the inclusion of selected additives that promote competitive dehydration of Mg and subsequent agglomeration, nucleation and crystallization. Towards tracking mineralisation and these steps of the reaction, neutron scattering presents unprecedented advantages over traditional techniques for time-resolved in situ measurements. However, a setup providing continuous solution circulation to ensure reactant system homogeneity for industrially relevant CO2-mineralizsation was currently available for use on neutron beamlines. We therefore undertook the design, construction, testing and implementation of such a self-contained reactor rig for use on selected neutron beamlines at the ISIS Neutron and Muon Source (Chilton, UK). The design ensured robust attachment via suspension from the covering flange to stabilize the reactor assembly and all fittings, as well as facilitating precise alignment of the entire reactor and sample (test) cell with respect to beam dimension and direction. The assembly successfully accomplished the principal tasks of providing a continuous flow of the reaction mixture for homogeneity, quantitative control of CO2 flux into the mixture as well as temperature and pressure regulation throughout the reaction and measurements. The design is discussed, with emphasis placed on the reactor including its geometry, components and all technical specifications. Descriptions of the off-beamline bench tests, safety and functionality, as well as the installation on beamlines and trial experimental procedure are provided, together with representative raw neutron scattering results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxivSame topicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsFrench-language works237,207