MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311017408 · doi:10.1021/acsaelm.2c01228

Materials Design Strategies for Solvent-Resistant Organic Electronics

2022· article· en· W4311017408 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Electronic Materials · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOrganic Electronics and Photovoltaics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNanotechnologyMaterials scienceElectronicsOrganic electronicsDeposition (geology)Electronic materialsChemistryTransistorElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Design of organic π-conjugated semiconducting materials is an exciting avenue of research that has already found promising applications in a wide variety of fields, ranging from stretchable electronics to bioimaging and theranostics. With favorable optoelectronic and thermomechanical properties, these materials and related devices can provide a complementary alternative to commercial silicon-based electronics. One of the most important features of organic semiconductors is their ability to be solution processed, allowing access to a wide variety of printing and solution deposition techniques inaccessible to silicon. However, the solution processability of these materials also poses challenges for the development of multilayer electronics due to potential problems such as swelling, film deformation and interfacial mixing that can occur upon successive solution deposition. Use of orthogonal (noncompatible) solvents and solvent-free deposition methods have been extensively investigated as solutions to this challenge, although the applicability of these approaches is limited by the chemical properties of the materials used. Another approach to address this problem is to focus on the materials rather than deposition methods. Through rational design, functional groups can be used to create triggered solvent resistance through covalent or dynamic intermolecular bonds. Design strategies include the incorporation of photo- and thermally cleavable functional groups in the materials, or the use of chemical additives/reagents to significantly alter the solubility of π-conjugated materials and afford solvent-resistant thin films. This spotlight article presents recent progress toward solvent-resistant organic materials with an emphasis on their use in electronic applications. Recent and key developments will be discussed from a personal perspective, providing an overview of the different approaches used to achieve solvent-resistant semiconducting materials toward the fabrication of advanced, multilayer organic electronics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it