MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311017877 · doi:10.5753/sbie.2022.224716

A Technological Monitoring Architecture for Academics' Mental and Physical Health

2022· article· en· W4311017877 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Wagno Sérgio Leão, Gabriel Di iorio Silva, Victor Ströele, Mário A. R. Dantas, Fernanda Campos, Regina Braga, José David

Bibliographic record

VenueAnais do XXXIII Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação (SBIE 2022) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health Research Topics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidade Federal de Juiz de ForaCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCanadian Bureau for International Education
KeywordsArchitectureComputer scienceAnxietyMental healthWork (physics)Learning environmentHuman–computer interactionApplied psychologyMultimediaPsychologyMathematics educationEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Educational institutions are moving to a hybrid model that allows onsite and online classes. Students and teachers must adapt to these changes in the teaching and learning routine, leading them to stress and anxiety moments. This work proposes an architecture to assist academics in detecting these stressful moments during daily activities. The proposal uses smart bands, machine learning algorithms, and a smartphone app for environment monitoring. The evaluation was conducted by collecting real data from heart rate spikes and enriching it using the location information to send recommendations. The results show that it is possible to identify stressful moments by respecting the academics environment by monitoring their routine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnais do XXXIII Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação (SBIE 2022)Same topicMental Health Research TopicsFrench-language works237,207