MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311029713 · doi:10.1063/5.0129564

Advection-based temporal reconstruction technique for turbulent velocity fields

2022· article· en· W4311029713 on OpenAlexaff
Maegan Vocke, Ralf Kapulla, Chris Morton, Markus Klein, Robert J. Martinuzzi

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsTurbulenceAdvectionParticle image velocimetryJet (fluid)Spectral methodVelocimetryFlow (mathematics)Statistical physicsAlgorithmMechanicsMathematical analysisMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The characterization of turbulent flows is challenging due to the interaction of widespread spatiotemporal scales. Experimental techniques such as particle image velocimetry can be used to obtain spatially resolved flow measurements; however, these systems often suffer from limited acquisition rates. The present work investigates the ability of an advection-based flow reconstruction technique to increase the temporal resolution of turbulent flow data without any prior knowledge of the flow physics. A semi-Lagrangian technique is suggested to obtain fluid trajectories through a forward and backward integration of the available spatiotemporal data. The estimates are then fused using a temporal weighting scheme to yield velocity fields at intermediate times. The performance of the method is verified against three-dimensional direct numerical simulation (DNS) data of a plane jet at Re = 10 000. Extracting time series data from the spatially and temporally resolved DNS results, five test cases with artificially lowered sampling frequencies were generated. Spectral analysis revealed that the characteristic frequency found in shear layer-dominated flows can be obtained even for the most extreme case. Additionally, spectral information up to two orders of magnitude beyond the Nyquist criteria is successfully recovered throughout the spatial domain—surpassing the performance of previously introduced methods. The maximum spectral reconstruction error of the suggested method, defined as net energy loss or gain, fell within the bounds of [−5, 3]%, with a corresponding global energy difference in the range of [−2, 1]%. Furthermore, the spatially averaged reconstruction error for the velocity fluctuations was bound by [6±6]%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsFrench-language works237,207