Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for diverse <i>Malassezia</i> species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The genus Malassezia is an opportunistic lipid-dependent yeast that is associated with common skin diseases and has recently been associated with Crohn’s disease and certain cancers. Understanding the susceptibility of Malassezia to diverse antimicrobial agents is crucial for identifying effective antifungal therapies. Here, we tested the efficacy of isavuconazole, itraconazole, terbinafine and artemisinin against three Malassezia species: M. restricta, M. slooffiae , and M. sympodialis , using microbroth dilution techniques. We found antifungal properties for the two previously-unstudied antimicrobials: isavuconazole and artemisinin. Overall all Malassezia species were particularly susceptible to itraconazole, with a MIC range from 0.0015 to 0.1562 μM. Importance The Malassezia genus is known to be a cause of skin conditions and has recently been associated with diseases such as Crohn’s disease, pancreatic ductal carcinoma and breast cancer. This work was completed to assess the susceptibility to a variety of antimicrobial drugs on diverse Malassezia species, in particular Malassezia restricta .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".