The Ordovician System of Canada: an extensive stratigraphic record of Laurentian shallow water platforms and deep marine basins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Ordovician rocks extensively border and cover Laurentia or the North American Craton in Canada. These rocks represent diverse and significant successions spread across a variety of depositional and palaeogeographic settings in the Canadian Arctic Islands, Eastern Canada, Western Canada and the Canadian Interior. During much of the Ordovician, Laurentia straddled the palaeoequator and was flooded by extensive epicontinental seas, experiencing high temperatures and high faunal diversity. The central and western parts of the Laurentian Craton remained relatively stable during the Ordovician, but there was substantial tectonic activity with the Taconic Orogeny affecting the Appalachian area and the Pearya composite terrane affecting the Franklinian Margin along its eastern and northern margins, respectively. The large Hudson Bay and Williston basins and smaller satellite basins cover the cratonic interior in Canada. These shallow intracratonic basins, dominated by marine carbonates with some evaporites, are the erosional remnant of a more extensive sea episodically connected with the adjacent platformal areas during the Ordovician. The Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) for the base of the Ordovician System is exposed in Green Point, western Newfoundland while the Ordovician–Silurian boundary interval is well exposed on Anticosti Island, Québec but is also present in Ontario, Manitoba, Yukon and Arctic Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".