Impact of stakeholders as board members on sustainability and social outreach of microfinance institutions in developing markets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explore how stakeholders on the board contribute to sustainability and outreach of microfinance institutions (MFI). Stakeholders as board members can influence the social outreach and sustainability of microfinance institutions (MFIs). By applying a multi-theoretical approach to a longitudinal dataset from a developing country perspective, this study analyses stakeholder involvement on the MFI board and its impact on double-bottom-line performance. The results suggest that independent directors on the board have significantly positive effects on achieving microfinance institutions' dual missions: sustainability and outreach. However, some stakeholders have produced mixed results. Employees, donors, and female board members play significant roles, although their impacts are moderated by the age and size of MFIs. CEO duality contributes to MFI sustainability but inversely affects outreach. The results support the stakeholder, stewardship, and resource dependence theories. This study recommends the appointment of an independent board member as a social director to widen the range of stakeholders' involvement in the boards of MFIs and contribute to achieving its objectives in a developing market context.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".