MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311086668 · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2022.11.026

Defining Morphologic Features of Invasion in Pulmonary Nonmucinous Adenocarcinoma With Lepidic Growth: A Proposal by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Pathology Committee

2022· article· en· W4311086668 on OpenAlexaff
Erik Thunnissen, Mary Beth Beasley, Alain Borczuk, Sanja Đačić, Keith M. Kerr, Birgit I. Lissenberg‐Witte, Yuko Minami, Andrew G. Nicholson, Masayuki Noguchi, Lynette M. Sholl, Ming‐Sound Tsao, John Le Quesne, Anja C. Roden, Jin-Haeng Chung, Akihiko Yoshida, André L. Moreira, Sylvie Lantuéjoul, Giuseppe Pelosi, Claudia Poleri, David Hwang, Deepali Jain, William D. Travis, Élisabeth Brambilla, Gang Chen, Johan Botling, Lukas Bubendorf, Mari Mino–Kenudson, Noriko Motoi, Teh Ying Chou, Mauro Papotti, Yasushi Yatabe, Wendy A. Cooper

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Thoracic Oncology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science CentreUniversity of TorontoHealth Sciences CentreUniversity Health Network
FundersVrije Universiteit AmsterdamInternational Association for the Study of Lung Cancer
KeywordsMedicineAdenocarcinomaLung cancerPathologyCancerLungStage (stratigraphy)Surgical pathologyInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Since the eight edition of the Union for International Cancer Control and American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification system, the primary tumor pT stage is determined on the basis of presence and size of the invasive components. The aim of this study was to identify histologic features in tumors with lepidic growth pattern which may be used to establish criteria for distinguishing invasive from noninvasive areas. METHODS: A Delphi approach was used with two rounds of blinded anonymized analysis of resected nonmucinous lung adenocarcinoma cases with presumed invasive and noninvasive components, followed by one round of reviewer de-anonymized and unblinded review of cases with known outcomes. A digital pathology platform was used for measuring total tumor size and invasive tumor size. RESULTS: The mean coefficient of variation for measuring total tumor size and tumor invasive size was 6.9% (range: 1.7%-22.3%) and 54% (range: 14.7%-155%), respectively, with substantial variations in interpretation of the size and location of invasion among pathologists. Following the presentation of the results and further discussion among members at large of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Pathology Committee, extensive epithelial proliferation (EEP) in areas of collapsed lepidic growth pattern is recognized as a feature likely to be associated with invasive growth. The EEP is characterized by multilayered luminal epithelial cell growth, usually with high-grade cytologic features in several alveolar spaces. CONCLUSIONS: Collapsed alveoli and transition zones with EEP were identified by the Delphi process as morphologic features that were a source of interobserver variability. Definition criteria for collapse and EEP are proposed to improve reproducibility of invasion measurement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.086
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.063
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.457

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0860.063
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0060.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0060.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Thoracic OncologySame topicLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207