Sex-specific deubiquitylation drives immune-related neurodegeneration in <i>Drosophila</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Risk of neurodegenerative disease such as late onset Alzheimer’s is linked to aberrant ubiquitinylation and accumulation of non-degraded proteins in brain cells. A glial network of innate immune genes modulates inflammatory responses to such protein deposition. However, vulnerability differs between the sexes. Here, we show that the Drosophila homologue of the deubiquitylase Trabid can align the sex-specific aspects of neurodegenerative phenotypes with changes in ubiquitylation and inflammatory activity. An enzymatically null Trabid in flies, caused sex-specific changes in locomotion, sleep patterns, brain histology and ultimately, lifespan. These changes were underscored by altered ubiquitin and proteome enrichment profiles and the same enzymatic activity as its human counterpart. When the sex-determination gene transformer was silenced in astrocytes or immunocompetent tissues, sex differences were significantly reduced. Our results indicate that Trabid underscores sex-specificity in disease neurology, by controlling the balance between ubiquitylation and inflammation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".