Behavioral and axon histomorphometric analyses after intraneural transplantation of human skin‐ and nerve‐derived Schwann cells in nude rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/AIMS: We have recently isolated and expanded skin-derived Schwann cells (Sk-SCs) from human skin and showed that they are largely similar to nerve-derived Schwann cells (N-SCs). Here, we extend our investigation into functional assessments of the nude rats that received human Sk-SCs and N-SCs after intraneural delivery into crushed and decellularized tibial nerve in adult nude rats. METHODS: Sk-SCs, N-SCs, dermal fibroblasts, or control culture medium was injected into the crushed and decellularized tibial nerve using in situ repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Animals were then subjected to a ladder rung walking test, nociceptive von Frey testing, and walking gait analysis weekly. Animals were euthanized 6 weeks after surgery, gastrocnemius and soleus muscles were weighed, distal nerves were harvested, and whole semithin cross-sections were analyzed using segmentation software. RESULTS: N-SC-injected and dermal fibroblast-injected animals improved significantly at 4 to 6 weeks postinjury in nociceptive assessment compared with medium-injected controls. Sk-SCs recovered more rapidly in tibial functional index at 2 weeks postinjury compared with medium-injected controls. No significant difference was observed for the ladder rung walking test or muscle weight ratio. Histologically, the number of myelinated axons was significantly higher in all cell injection groups compared with medium-injected controls. No significant difference was observed in g ratio, axon diameter, or myelin thickness. DISCUSSION: Cell injection significantly improved axon regeneration across an in situ decellularized nerve segment. However, a more human cell-permissive animal model is required to delineate functional differences between cell types for preclinical transplantation studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".