MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311133098 · doi:10.18280/jesa.550503

Study and Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Progressive Feed Rate on Surface Roughness in CNC End Milling Process Using RSM

2022· article· en· W4311133098 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Srinivasa Rao Bommisetty, Kanna Babu Chettu, Shivananda Nayaka Hanumanthappa

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced machining processes and optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Technology Karnataka, Surathkal
KeywordsSurface roughnessMachiningResponse surface methodologyTaguchi methodsDesign of experimentsEnd millingMaterials scienceEnd millSurface finishEngineering drawingProcess (computing)Mechanical engineeringMetallurgyComposite materialMathematicsEngineeringComputer scienceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this research work is to investigate the influence of cutting parameters on the average surface roughness (Ra) in an end milling process. Feed rate (f), Spindle speed (s) and Depth of cut (d) are the cutting parameters considered as significant factors. A case study on the progressive feed (PF) and conventional constant feed (CF) machining characteristics of Aluminum alloy BS L168-T6511 using end milling is considered. Taguchi's design of experiments (DoE) technique is applied for various combinations of cutting factors and average surface roughness was measured using Mitutoyo surftest SJ-301 surface roughness tester. The experimental results of Ra are analyzed by response surface methodology (RSM). The predicted values using the developed regression mathematical model are compared against experimental results and were found in close agreement. ANOVA technique was applied to further analyze the data for checking the model adequacy and to predict the influence of each parameter on output response Ra. Main effect plots, Interaction plots, 3D surface plots, and Contour plots are established. The investigation reveals that output response (Ra) is predominantly affected by feed rate and progressive feed machining (PFM) yields better surface finish than the conventional constant feed machining (CFM) for the end milling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.462

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicAdvanced machining processes and optimizationFrench-language works237,207