MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311156018 · doi:10.3390/electronics11244140

Improvement of UAV Tracking Technology in Future 6G Complex Environment Based on GM-PHD Filter

2022· article· en· W4311156018 on OpenAlexaff
Tao Hong, Chunying Zhou, Michel Kadoch, Tao Tang, Zhengfa Zuo

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceFilter (signal processing)AdaptabilityClutterReal-time computingTracking (education)WirelessInterference (communication)RadarArtificial intelligenceChannel (broadcasting)Computer visionComputer networkTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) will become an indispensable part of future sixth-generation (6G)-based mobile networks that can provide flexible deposition, strong adaptability, and high service quality. Under the guarantee of blockchain, UAVs can provide efficient communication or computing services for ground intelligence devices and promote the development of wireless communication. However, as the number of UAVs increases, issues regarding UAV path planning, the handling of emergencies, the intrusion of illegal UAVs, etc., will need to be addressed. This paper proposes an improved Gaussian mixture probability hypothesis density (GM-PHD) filter based on machine learning for the target tracking and recognition of non-cooperative UAV swarms. Simulation results demonstrate that the improved filter can effectively suppress clutter interference in complex environments and improve the performance of multi-target recognition and trajectory tracking compared with the traditional GM-PHD filter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score0.345

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronicsSame topicUAV Applications and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207