HayCAM: A Novel Visual Explanation for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Explaining the decision mechanism of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) is a new and challenging area because of the “Black Box” nature of CNN's. Class Activation Mapping (CAM) as a visual explainable method is used to highlight important regions of input images by using classification gradients. The lack of the current methods is to use all of the filters in the last convolutional layer which causes scattered and unfocused activation mapping. HayCAM as a novel visualization method provides better activation mapping and therefore better localization by using dimension reduction. It has been shown with mask detection use case that input images are fed into the CNN model and bounding boxes are drawn over the generated activation maps (i.e. weakly-supervised object detection) by three different CAM methods. IoU values are obtained as 0.1922 for GradCAM, 0.2472 for GradCAM++, 0.3386 for EigenCAM, and 0.3487 for the proposed HayCAM. The results show that HayCAM achieves the best activation mapping with dimension reduction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".