A Hybrid Iterative Algorithm of Amplitude Weighting and Phase Gradient Descent for Generating Phase-Only Fourier Hologram
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reconstruction of target images from phase-only hologram (POH) has the advantages of high diffraction efficiency and no conjugate terms. The Gerchberg-Saxton (GS) algorithm is a classical algorithm applied to recover the phase, but it most likely stagnantes after a few iterations. This paper proposes a hybrid iterative algorithm of Amplitude Weighting and Phase Gradient Descent (AW-PGD) to generate a higher-quality POH. Firstly, the quadratic phase is used as the initial phase, zero-pads the periphery of the target image, and then multiplies the two to form the complex amplitude as the iterative initial value. During iteration, the amplitude of the reconstructed image is constrained by an adaptive dynamic exponential term in the signal region to improve the reconstruction accuracy, the constraint in the non-signal region is relaxed to reduce the computational effort at the same time; and the phase gradient descent technology is used to increase the iteration step and speed up the convergence. Finally, the target image amplitude is reconstructed based on the generated POH. The numerical simulation results show that the algorithm does not have a significant increase in time cost with better reconstruction quality than the GS, Weighted GS (WGS) and Adaptive Weighted GS (AWGS) algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it