Driver Identification System Using Finger Vein and YOLO Object Detection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biometrics used to identify people is one of the safest and most convenient identification methods. The hypoxic hemoglobin method can present a human finger vein image for driver identification through infrared ray irradiation. The finger vein image is captured system; with the finger vein image processed using contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE) and the Gabor filter to obtain a clearer image. The YOLO object detection technology is used to drive identification. The proposed system can be divided into two parts. The first part is the training part, which processes images. A database generates the weight files for external testing. The second part is the testing system. When the driver's finger is placed in the designated photo area a photo will be taken. The photo will be processed and run on Raspberry Pi 4 together with the weight file to identify the driver. The experimental results show that when the database has a large amount of data, the yolov4-tiny-hy recognition rate is comparable to that of YOLOv4. The training time is greatly shortened.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".