MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4311190462 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244559

Molecules in the peculiar age-defying source IRAS 19312+1950

2022· article· en· W4311190462 on OpenAlexaff
Jianjie Qiu, Yong Zhang, Junichi Nakashima, J. S. Zhang, Nico Koning, Xindi Tang, Y. T. Yan, Huan-Xue Feng

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersBasic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNatural Science Foundation of XinjiangSun Yat-sen UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaEuropean Space AgencyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsAstrophysicsPhysicsMaserYoung stellar objectContext (archaeology)Line (geometry)InfraredAstronomyIsotopologueMolecular cloudTelescopePoint sourceH II regionRadio telescopeStar formationSpectral lineGalaxyStarsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context. IRAS 19312+1950 is an isolated infrared source that exhibits a characteristic quasi-point-symmetric morphology in the near-and mid-infrared images and is also very bright in molecular radio lines. Because of its unique observational characteristics, various observational studies have been conducted and several hypotheses have been proposed regarding its origin, which is still unclear. So far, it has been suggested that it could be a peculiar evolved star, a young stellar object, or even a red nova remnant. Regardless of which type of object it is ultimately classified as, IRAS 19312+1950 is exceptionally bright in the infrared and molecular radio lines and therefore will undoubtedly be crucial as a prototype of this kind of object having a peculiar nature or unusual evolutionary phase. Aims. This study aims to reveal the molecular composition of the central part of IRAS 19312+1950 by performing an unbiased molecular radio line survey and discussing the origin of the object from a molecular chemical point of view. Methods. We carried out a spectral line survey with the Institut de Radioastronomie Millimtrique 30 m telescope towards the centre of IRAS 19312+1950 in the 3 and 1.3 mm windows with a frequency coverage of 83.9–91.8 and 218.2–226.0 GHz, respectively. Results. In total, 28 transition lines of 22 molecular species and those isotopologues are detected towards IRAS 19312+1950, some of which exhibit a broad and a narrow component. Seventeen thermal lines and one maser line are newly detected. The molecular species of C17O, 30SiO, HN13C, HC18O+, H2CO, and c-C3H2 are detected for the first time in this object. We calculated the optical depths of the transition lines of 13CO, C18O, HCN, H13CN, and C2H, and determined the rotational temperatures, column densities, and fractional abundances of the detected molecules. We got the isotopic ratios of 12C/13C, 14N/15N, 16O/18O, 16O/17O, 18O/17O, 28Si/30Si, and 29Si/30Si in IRAS 19312+1950 and the values were compared to those of evolved stars, red novae, young stellar objects, and the Sun. The intensities of the molecular radio lines of IRAS 19312+1950 were compared with those of different categories of objects, indicating that the spectral pattern of the broad-line region is similar to that of a red nova or a low-mass young stellar object, while the narrow-line region behaves like an envelope of the asymptotic giant branch star. Conclusions. Our results, in combination with previous studies, favour the hypothesis that IRAS 19312+1950 might be a red nova remnant, in which the progenitors that merged to become a red nova may have contained at least two evolved stars with oxygen-rich and carbon-rich chemistry, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies→French-language works237,207→