Les musées d’art sacré de Dijon et de Saint-Mihiel : va-et-vient entre collection et usage liturgique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les musées d’art sacré de Dijon (Côte-d’Or) et de Saint-Mihiel (Meuse), labellisés « Musées de France », participent à la préservation et à la valorisation du patrimoine religieux de leur département. Ils accueillent notamment des objets en dépôt qui conservent leur propriétaire et leur affectation cultuelle. Les mises en exposition témoignent d’une volonté de restituer les sens et usages religieux tout en mettant en avant d’autres aspects des artefacts. Si le Musée d’art sacré de Saint-Mihiel invite à la contemplation des œuvres, celui de Dijon mêle les collections à l’histoire du lieu. La vie liturgique de trois objets de ces institutions a perduré malgré leur dépôt. Ces cas spécifiques permettent de réfléchir au rapport entre les statuts muséal et cultuel, et attestent des interpénétrations entre les différents systèmes de valeurs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".