MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Digital Realization of Conductance-Based Adaptive Exponential Integrate-and-Fire Neuron Model

2022· article· en· W4311224397 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 29th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems (ICECS) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuromorphic engineeringComputer scienceRealization (probability)Artificial neuronBiological neuron modelField (mathematics)Computer architectureExponential functionComputer engineeringArtificial intelligenceComputational scienceArtificial neural networkMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The field of neuromorphic engineering is a multidisciplinary research topic which incorporates the knowledge of Neuroscience, physics, biology, and electronic engineering in order to replicate the neurological patterns of human brain. This paper presents a digital design based on CORDIC algorithm for a biologically inspired neuron model called Conductance-Based Adaptive Exponential Integrate-and-Fire (CAdEx) neuron model which is recently proposed by Gorski. The low-cost hardware implementation for the proposed model is capable of reproducing the same spiking activity of the original biological model. The modified digital architecture has been physically implemented on field programmable gate arrays. A maximum frequency of 129 MHz is obtained for the modified design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.206
Threshold uncertainty score0.897

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it