Validating fatty acid binding protein 3 as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for peripheral arterial disease: a three-year prospective follow-up study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) often remain undiagnosed and therefore suboptimally managed. Here, we investigated the diagnostic and prognostic potential of fatty acid binding protein 3 (FABP3) in patients with PAD. Methods: In the discovery phase, 374 PAD and 184 non-PAD patients were recruited from vascular surgery ambulatory clinics at St. Michael's Hospital (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) between October 4, 2017 to October 29, 2018. The diagnostic ability of baseline FABP3 level was investigated through receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves to determine two cutoff points: 1) an exclusionary "rule out" cutoff point, and 2) a confirmatory "rule in" cutoff point. Next, these cutoff points were confirmed in the external validation phase using a separate cohort of 312 patients (180 PAD and 132 non-PAD) recruited from ambulatory vascular surgery clinics at St. Michael's Hospital (Canada) between November 6, 2018-July 30, 2019. Cox regression analyses were used to explore the independent association between FABP3 and major adverse limb events (MALE - defined as need for arterial revascularization or major amputation) and decrease in ankle-brachial index (ABI -defined as drop ≥0.15) during 3 years of follow-up. Findings: In the discovery phase, FABP3 levels were significantly elevated in patients with PAD compared to non-PAD patients. ROC analysis demonstrated that FABP3 had an AUC of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.81-0.86, p-value < 0.001). FABP3 exclusionary cutoff was <1.55 ng/ml (sensitivity = 96%; specificity = 40%), whereas FABP3 confirmatory cutoff was >3.55 ng/ml (sensitivity = 43%; specificity = 95%) - values that were confirmed in the external validation phase. Cox regression analysis demonstrated FABP3 to be an independent predictor of increase in MALE [HR = 1.14 (1.03-1.29); p-value = 0.010] and worsening PAD status (drop in ABI >0.15 [HR = 1.11 (1.02-1.19); p-value = 0.009]). Interpretation: Our findings suggested that FABP3 levels can be used as both a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for PAD, and may facilitate risk stratification in select individuals for purposes of vascular evaluation or intensive medical management. Funding: Funding for this study was provided by the Bill and Vicky Blair Foundation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".