MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311242194 · doi:10.1115/1.4056466

Investigations of In-Plane Fluidelastic Instability in a Multispan U-Bend Tube Array—Part I: Tests in Air Flow

2022· article· en· W4311242194 on OpenAlexaffabout
Paul Feenstra, Téguewindé Sawadogo, Bruce A. Smith, Victor P. Janzen, Helen Cothron

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration and Dynamic Analysis
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nuclear Laboratories
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTube (container)BundleInstabilityStructural engineeringBar (unit)Flow (mathematics)MechanicsRefrigerantEngineeringMaterials scienceMechanical engineeringPhysicsMeteorologyComposite materialHeat exchanger

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The tubes in the U-bend region of a recirculating type of nuclear steam generator are subjected to cross-flow of a two-phase mixture of steam and water. There is a concern that these tubes may experience flow-induced vibration, including the damaging effects of fluidelastic instability. This two-part series of papers presents the results of flow-induced vibration experiments performed by Canadian Nuclear Laboratories for the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) using the Multi-Span U-Bend test rig. The tube bundle is made of 22 U-bend tubes of 12.7 mm (0.5 in.) diameter, arranged in a rotated triangular configuration with a pitch-to-diameter ratio of 1.5. The test rig was equipped with variable clearance flat bar supports at two different locations to investigate a variety of tube and flat-bar support configurations. The primary purpose of the overall project was to study the occurrence of in-plane (or streamwise) fluidelastic instability in a U-tube bundle with flat-bar tube supports with clearances or preloads. Initially, the test rig was configured for tests in air-flow using an industrial air blower. Then tests with two-phase refrigerant (R-134a) were performed. Part I of this two-part series describes the test rig, experimental setup and some of the challenges encountered, and the results of experiments with air flows. Part II will present results of tests using refrigerant two-phase flows.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.503

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pressure Vessel TechnologySame topicVibration and Dynamic AnalysisFrench-language works237,207