MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311263210 · doi:10.37775/eis.2022.2.4

Investigation of materials flow during the manufacturing process by experimental evidence and numerical approaches

2022· article· en· W4311263210 on OpenAlexaff
János György Bátorfi, Gyula Pál, Chakravarty Purnima, Jurij J. Sidor

Bibliographic record

VenueMérnöki és Informatikai Megoldások · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallurgy and Material Forming
Canadian institutionsSavaria (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite element methodDeformation (meteorology)Flow (mathematics)Process (computing)Mechanical engineeringMaterial flowComputer scienceMechanicsEngineeringStructural engineeringMaterials sciencePhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the modeling possibilities applicable to rolling processes were summarized, with particular reference to finite element models (FEM) and different flow-line models (FLM). The results of the analysis suggest that the different models are suitable for the study of deformation processes during cold rolling. Furthermore, the possibilities for the extension of the FLM model are summarized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score0.599

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMérnöki és Informatikai MegoldásokSame topicMetallurgy and Material FormingFrench-language works237,207