MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311274466 · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(22)00499-5

Enhancing cervical and breast cancer training in Africa with e-learning

2022· letter· en· W4311274466 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Joël Fokom Domgue, Issimouha Dille, Laura Fry, Rosine Mafoma, Céline Bouchard, David Ngom, Nathalie Ledaga, Freddy Houéhanou Rodrigue Gnangnon, Mamadou Diop, B. Traoré, Mala Pande, Joseph Kamgno, Mohenou Isidore Diomande, Pierre Marie Tebeu, Fabrice Lécuru, Marie Plante, Jean-Marie Dangou, Sanjay Shete

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Global Health · 2022
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCanadian Women's Health Network
FundersNational Cancer InstituteUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterUniversité LavalWorld Health Organization
KeywordsBreast cancerCervical cancerMedicineCancerDiseaseFamily medicineOncologyGynecologyDemographyGerontologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The African continent carries a high share of the global cancer burden, with cervical and breast cancers being the main drivers of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in the region.1 Although the burden of cervical cancer has drastically decreased in high-income countries in the past three decades because of the widespread implementation of screening, early detection, human papillomavirus vaccination programmes, and improvements to accessing comprehensive cancer treatment services, nearly 90% of new cases and deaths from this preventable disease are from low-income and middle-income countries, and 19 of the 20 countries with the highest incidence rates worldwide are in Africa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.118

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Global HealthSame topicGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningFrench-language works237,207