MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311299308 · doi:10.1049/cmu2.12548

A neuro‐evolutionary approach for software defined wireless network traffic classification

2022· article· en· W4311299308 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Communications · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInternet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceWireless networkNetwork traffic controlTraffic classificationComputer networkMachine learningWirelessTraffic generation modelParticle swarm optimizationArtificial neural networkArtificial intelligenceSoftware-defined networkingDistributed computingNetwork packet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Accurate network traffic classification is an essential and challenging issue for wireless network management and survivability. Existing network traffic classification algorithms, on the other hand, cannot meet the required specifications of real networks' in terms of user privacy control overhead, latency, and above all, classification speed. For wireless network traffic classification, machine learning‐based and hybrid optimization techniques have been deployed. This paper takes a software‐defined wireless network (SDWN) architecture for network traffic classification into account. Because the proposed scheme is perfectly contained within the network controller,the SDWN controller's higher processing capability, global visibility, and programmability can be used to achieve real‐time, adaptive, and precise traffic classification. In this paper, a neuro‐evolutionary approach is proposed in which the feed forward neural network (FFNN) is the base classifier and particle swarm optimization (PSO) is used to train the FFNN to accurately classify traffic while minimizing communication overhead between the controller and the SDWN switches. Simulation experiments were conducted by acquiring real‐world internet datasets to test the efficacy of the proposed scheme. The results and the state‐of‐the‐art comparisons show that the proposed approach has outperformed in terms of accuracy in wireless traffic classification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.742
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it