Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Economy and the Banking Sector of Bulgaria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The goal of the research is to analyze the consequences caused by the coronavirus pandemic COVID-19 on the economy and the banking sector of Bulgaria. In structural terms, the research consists of an introduction, presentation, conclusion and cited sources. The significance of the researched topic is brought out in the introduction. The presentation analyzes the consequences caused by the COVID-19 pandemic on the economy of Bulgaria. It also analyzes the effect of the impact of the unfavorable macroeconomic environment caused by the coronavirus pandemic on the banking sector in our country. As we know, the stability of the banking system in a country is of extreme importance, because due to its structure-determining position, the banking sector is a key contributor to the dynamics of the economic development of the EU, including Bulgaria. The presentation of the article also describes the economic measures that have been taken with a view to reducing the adverse consequences of the new coronavirus. In the conclusion, the main implications of the research are presented, and the possibilities of using different policies are considered, with a view to mitigating the negative impact on the economic measures in the last quarter of 2022.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".