MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4311304997 · doi:10.1101/2022.12.12.22283365

Occupational exposure to insulating materials and risk of coronary artery diseases

2022· preprint· en· W4311304997 on OpenAlexaffabout
Subhabrata Moitra, Ali Farshchi Tabrizi, Fadi Khadour, Linda Henderson, Lyle Melenka, Paige Lacy

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOccupational and environmental lung diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersGlaxoSmithKlineAstraZeneca
KeywordsMedicineCoronary artery diseaseAsbestosFamily historyInternal medicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Background Although previous reports link exposure to insulating materials with an increased risk of mesothelioma and chronic respiratory diseases, studies evaluating their associations with the risk of coronary artery diseases (CAD) are lacking. Aims We aimed at evaluating associations between exposure to insulating materials and the 10-year risk of CAD among insulators. Methods In this cross-sectional study, we recruited 643 adults (≥18 years) who were full-time insulators from the Local 110 Heat and Frost Insulators and Allied Workers Union in Edmonton, Alberta. We obtained demographic information, personal and family history, and job-exposure history including experience (years) and types of exposure to insulating materials. Clinical profiling including Framingham risk scores (FRS) was assessed. Results Of all insulators, 89% were male (mean±SD age: 47±12 years), 27% had a parental history of cardiac diseases, and 22% had a comorbid chronic respiratory disease. 53% reported exposure to asbestos while 61, 82, and 94% reported exposure to ceramic fibers, fiberglass, and mineral fibers, respectively. In single-exposure multivariable regression models adjusted for experience, marital status, and body mass index (BMI), asbestos was found to be associated with higher FRS (β: 1.004; 95%CI: 0.003 to 2.00). The association remained consistent in multi-exposure models and a higher association between asbestos exposure and FRS among insulators with comorbid chronic respiratory disease. Conclusions Our study demonstrates that apart from cancer and chronic respiratory diseases, asbestos exposure may also have a cardiac effect and thus warranting the need for systematic surveillance to protect workers from the adverse effects of these materials. KEY LEARNING POINTS What is already known about this subject Insulating materials, particularly asbestos and man-made vitreous fibres (MMVFs) are well-known occupational hazards, and both long- and short-term exposure to these materials have been found to associate with increased risk of chronic respiratory diseases and cancers, and mortality due to those diseases. Evidence of the cardiovascular effects of asbestos and other MMVFs is scanty and only limited to empirical retrospective mortality studies; however, most of those studies produced mixed results on the roles of asbestos and other MMVFs on cardiovascular health. It is important to learn the effects of these insulating materials on organ systems other than the lungs in order to identify the potential health hazards of these materials and upgrade surveillance and current safety measures to protect the workers. What this study adds We studied over 800 workers who were exposed to a variety of insulating materials including asbestos and MMVFs and our results indicate an association between asbestos exposure and increased Framingham risk score (10-year estimated risk of cardiovascular diseases). Further long-term prospective studies are needed to assess the short and long-term effects of these exposures on disease development, particularly among non-smokers. Furthermore, the quantitation of workplace exposure is also important to understand the dose-response nature of these exposures. What impact this may have on practice or policy Our findings provide new evidence of asbestos-associated increased risk of cardiovascular diseases, which underscores the need for a more rigorous systematic monitoring of the health of workers. Our findings also warrant a more comprehensive knowledge of the physicians, particularly occupational physicians regarding the possible occupational risk factors for chronic diseases, including cardiovascular diseases. Our findings may provide a basis for further research and amendment of policies related to the workers’ health, protection, compensation, and benefits. TEASER TEXT Previous studies have demonstrated that exposure to insulating materials including asbestos is associated with an increased risk of mesothelioma and other chronic respiratory diseases. However, these materials have not been systematically investigated as possible risk factors for coronary artery diseases (CAD). Our study is the first to demonstrate an association between exposure to insulating materials, particularly asbestos, and an increased 10-year predicted risk of CAD. These findings warrant further control of exposure to these materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicOccupational and environmental lung diseases→French-language works237,207→