Surgissements, impasses et résistances: Une étude du désir lesboérotique dans <i>La fin de la joie</i> de Jacqueline Mabit et <i>Visage de fièvre</i> de Viviane Da Silva
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le présent article a pour objectif de poser un jalon dans la constitution d’une généalogie des désirs hétérodoxes en littérature québécoise francophone, et d’étudier La fin de la joie (1945) de Jacqueline Mabit et Visage de fièvre (1960) de Viviane Da Silva, deux œuvres aujourd’hui oubliées qui ont pourtant textualisé le désir lesboérotique avant l’émergence de la « première génération » d’écrivaines lesbiennes des années 1970. Il s’agit d’étudier les stratégies de refus (du deuil et de la fin chez Mabit, de l’hétérosexualité chez Da Silva) comme manières de textualiser le désir amoureux et sexuel entre femmes. C’est précisément à travers la négation que le désir émerge dans les deux œuvres et qu’il permet une interrogation de l’hétérosexualité comme institution dominante. Malgré certaines caractéristiques narratives conservatrices, La fin de la joie et Visage de fièvre font scission avec certaines normes, attentes et discours dominants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".