Bibliographic record
Abstract
New physical evidence of the compressibility of neutrons has supported a reappraisal of how neutron stars transition into black holes, taken from the perspective of an internal observer. After comparing observational evidence with relativistic models, it is concluded that, at least nonrotating isolated black holes are better termed as black stars, which fit a continuum of increasingly massive neutron stars that become invisible once they exceed a critical mass, suggested as 5 M ⊙ . Beyond this mass, two event horizons develop concurrently, separating to form a photon trap that exists between the inner horizon and the outer horizon. This inner horizon (below the surface) avoids the formation of a real singularity and is apparently ≤ 6.75 km radius, while the outer horizon is ≥ 6.75 km radius, confirmed as 50% of the Schwarzschild radius. The mathematical singularity that is apparent to an external observer in general relativity may be an illusion. Our methodology also shows how gravitational redshift may inform the mass and surface radius of a neutron star.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".