MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311347515 · doi:10.29169/1927-5951.2022.12.04

Mode of Actions of Bile Acids in Avoidance of Colorectal Cancer Development; and their Therapeutic Applications in Cancers - A Narrative Review

2022· review· en· W4311347515 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kulvinder Kochar Kaur, Gautam Allahbadia, Mandeep Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pharmacy and Nutrition Sciences · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNecroptosisAutophagyProgrammed cell deathColorectal cancerCancerCancer researchApoptosisBiochemistryMedicineBiologyChemistryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bile Acids (BAs) possess a considerably significant part in the form of emulsifiers in digestion besides absorption of dietary lipids. BAs represent amphiphilic molecules, that are primary metabolites formed from cholesterol by the aid of enzymes acting on cholesterol. Earlier BAs were believed to be tumor repressors. The tumor repressive actions of BAs are correlated with programmed cell death (PCD). Furthermore, dependent on this observation different Synthetic BAs products have been generated along with their utilization regarding induction of PCD (in the form of apoptosis, autophagy or necroptosis in variable kinds of human cancers. Thus we conducted a narrative review till August 2022. The present article might form the basis of generationof such innovative therapies even for cancers/tumors that are cisplatin resistant. With time these therapies might be used for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases (NDD), amyotrophic sclerosis, and numerous metabolic and haematological diseases as described for use of TUDCA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.436
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pharmacy and Nutrition SciencesSame topicDrug Transport and Resistance MechanismsFrench-language works237,207