A moda e os modos na Socila: hexis corporal e a fachada da elegância
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A Socila foi uma escola de boas maneiras fundada no Rio de Janeiro, com grande sucesso entre as décadas de 1950 e 1970, que até hoje é mencionada na imprensa como sinônimo de elegância. Uma de suas fundadoras, Maria Augusta, ensinou a centenas de mulheres o chamado “aperfeiçoamento social”: era importante não apenas se embelezar, mas dominar técnicas de postura e educação do corpo a fim de compor o que Goffman ([1959] 2014) denomina “fachada”. A moda é um elemento da fachada? Quais são os outros? Por meio da análise de reportagens3 sobre a Socila na imprensa (1954-2022), propomos refletir em que medida a elegância é uma construção a partir dos modos; se e como pode ser aprendida por meio do ensino do habitus e de uma hexis corporal (BOURDIEU, 1983); e refletir sobre roupa e corpo como elementos que se amalgamam em uma produção de sentido.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".