MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311348317 · doi:10.26563/dobras.i36.1609

A moda e os modos na Socila: hexis corporal e a fachada da elegância

2022· article· pt· W4311348317 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuedObra[s] – revista da Associação Brasileira de Estudos de Pesquisas em Moda · 2022
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPhysical Education and Gymnastics
Canadian institutionsinVentiv Health Clinical
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyHabitusSociologyEthnographyAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Socila foi uma escola de boas maneiras fundada no Rio de Janeiro, com grande sucesso entre as décadas de 1950 e 1970, que até hoje é mencionada na imprensa como sinônimo de elegância. Uma de suas fundadoras, Maria Augusta, ensinou a centenas de mulheres o chamado “aperfeiçoamento social”: era importante não apenas se embelezar, mas dominar técnicas de postura e educação do corpo a fim de compor o que Goffman ([1959] 2014) denomina “fachada”. A moda é um elemento da fachada? Quais são os outros? Por meio da análise de reportagens3 sobre a Socila na imprensa (1954-2022), propomos refletir em que medida a elegância é uma construção a partir dos modos; se e como pode ser aprendida por meio do ensino do habitus e de uma hexis corporal (BOURDIEU, 1983); e refletir sobre roupa e corpo como elementos que se amalgamam em uma produção de sentido.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it