Blind time‐domain motion compensation for synthetic Doppler spectra obtained from an HF‐radar on a floating platform
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A method for time‐domain motion compensation of high frequency (HF) radar signals for the case of a floating transmitter and fixed receiver is proposed when the motion parameters (including the amplitude and angular frequency of the motion) are not known a priori. In this study, the floating platform is assumed to follow a single‐frequency motion model. Additionally, instead of trying to estimate platform motion parameters from the received motion‐contaminated Doppler spectrum, which is proportional to the observed radar cross‐section of the ocean surface from the floating platform, the motion parameters from the autocorrelation function of the received electric field are estimated, which is related to the received radar cross‐section by application of an inverse temporal Fourier transform. By comparing the locations of the zeros of the autocorrelation function for the fixed antenna case with that for an antenna on a floating platform and finding the zeros associated with the platform motion, the motion parameters are estimated. These parameters are matched with actual motion parameter values, from which the motion‐compensated Doppler spectrum is recovered from the Doppler spectrum of the antenna on a floating platform.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".