Terrestrial Projections of the Cosmic Environmental Connections
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to prevent the global, regional or/and local ecological catastrophes, in the actual terrestrial evolutionary circumstances it’s worth extending the researches of the EEE Ecology/environment-Ecumeny/population-Economy/activity tri-interactional systems from the global to the macro- and micro-cosmic level, based on the Hermetic interactional axioms „as up so down and as down so up”, „as inside so outside and as outside so inside”, „as earlier so later and as later so earlier”, and „as in micro so in macro and as in macro so in micro”. In macro-direction, limiting successive „Our Cosmic Environment”/ ”Our Local Universe” from „Our Whole Universe” to „Our Galaxy Milky Way”, with „Our Photon-Belt” on the exterior end of its fifth/irregular „Orion-Arm”, along which Möbius-like toroidal belt is whirling solenoid-like the Sun – Twin-Sun – Moon system (the Helios – Eos/Hemera – Selena second wave of Titans in Hesiod’s „Theogony”) , results a multicomplex motion of the Earth (Gaia in „Theogony”) as component of the Solar System. In micro-direction, in the Whole Periodic System, extended from the actually recognized 118 elements to 558, respectively with the Etheron-Gluon-Quark as primary elements, result similar multicomplex vibrations between the extreme limits of the Material World. The functional-formal-structural elements of this cosmic environment appear in form of projections on the terrestrial and other planetary surfaces, as an open book of the Nature, this surface including not only the global geoid-like geometrical multilayered envelope, but the inner fractal-like structured coating/strata of the Earth (and of the Earth-like planets).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".