MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Energy Neutral Urban Noise Monitoring and Classification With LoRaWAN Based IoT

2022· article· en· W4311412685 on OpenAlex
H. Emre Erdem, Henry Leung, Nan Xie

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE Sensors · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicNoise Effects and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoftware deploymentComputer scienceNoise (video)Smart gridInternet of ThingsEnergy (signal processing)Energy consumptionGridWireless sensor networkTelecommunicationsReal-time computingComputer networkElectrical engineeringEmbedded systemEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Internet of Things (IoT) technology paves the way for novel smart city applications. Noise monitoring systems are among these applications, and they help local authorities enforce noise limits more effectively. While some monitoring systems lack easy deployment due to the requirement of physical connection to electric grid or communication network, others need high maintenance because of quick battery depletion. The latter problem becomes even more challenging for the applications with noise classification capability due to higher consumption figures. This paper presents a noise monitoring and classification (NMC) system that enables energy neutral operation using solar harvester and exploiting low power capabilities of LoRaWAN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.361
Threshold uncertainty score0.839

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it