MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311435706 · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.21699764

Developing a Social Platform using MERN Stack

2022· preprint· en· W4311435706 on OpenAlexafffund
Krutika Desai, Jinan Fiaidhi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
FundersMinistère de l'Énergie et des Ressources NaturellesLakehead University
KeywordsWorld Wide WebVariety (cybernetics)Social mediaComputer scienceStack (abstract data type)Key (lock)The InternetDigital contentMultimediaArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>This is the era of internet and there are a lot of Social Media platforms out there that facilitate the sharing a vast variety of user generated content. LinkedIn is a business and employment oriented social platform whereas Twitter is used to share recent news trends and updates. Pinterest is about discovering new content and ideas while Facebook is more about catching up with friends and family. These networks and virtual communities cast a tremendous amount of influence on their users. Here we have a similar content-oriented platform called Social. It is designed and built for the users to connect and share digital content (like text, images and/or gifs) related to community, social, healthcare and welfare services. MERN stands for MongoDB, ExpressJS, ReactJS and NodeJS (the four key technologies that make the stack) and is used to built this fully responsive web application in conjugation with other APIs and tools.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.260
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.675
GPT teacher head0.607
Teacher spread0.068 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207