Patient-specific Cardio-respiratory Motion Prediction in X-ray Angiography using LSTM Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objective. To develop a novel patient-specific cardio-respiratory motion prediction approach for X-ray angiography time series based on a simple long short-term memory (LSTM) model. Approach. The cardio-respiratory motion behavior in an X-ray image sequence was represented as a sequence of 2D affine transformation matrices, which provide the displacement information of contrasted moving objects (arteries and medical devices) in a sequence. The displacement information includes translation, rotation, shearing, and scaling in 2D. A many-to-many LSTM model was developed to predict 2D transformation parameters in matrix form for future frames based on previously generated images. The method was developed with 64 simulated phantom datasets (pediatric and adult patients) using a realistic cardio-respiratory motion simulator (XCAT) and was validated using 10 different patient X-ray angiography sequences. Main results. Using this method we achieved less than 1 mm prediction error for complex cardio-respiratory motion prediction. The following mean prediction error values were recorded over all the simulated sequences: 0.39 mm (for both motions), 0.33 mm (for only cardiac motion), and 0.47 mm (for only respiratory motion). The mean prediction error for the patient dataset was 0.58 mm. Significance. This study paves the road for a patient-specific cardio-respiratory motion prediction model, which might improve navigation guidance during cardiac interventions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".