MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311459593 · doi:10.1016/j.rcar.2022.12.002

Numerical evaluation of the effectiveness of frost heave mitigation strategies for chilled arctic gas pipelines

2022· article· en· W4311459593 on OpenAlexaff
XinZe Li, Qingbai Wu, Huijun Jin, Rui Shi, Gang Wu, Yapeng Cao

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch in Cold and Arid Regions · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersChinese Academy of Sciences
KeywordsPermafrostFrost heavingPipeline transportSlabThermal insulationThermal conductivityGeotechnical engineeringDynamic insulationEnvironmental scienceHeat transferGeothermal gradientGeologyMaterials scienceVacuum insulated panelLayer (electronics)MechanicsComposite materialEnvironmental engineeringGeophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To prevent the thawing of ice-rich permafrost, it is suggested that gas should be transported in a chilled state (below the freezing temperature) in pipelines buried in permafrost. However, frost heave occurs when water migrates towards the chilled pipeline and ice lenses grow underneath the pipe. This might endanger the integrity of the pipeline and the environment as well. Therefore, innovative frost heave mitigation measures are required when designing the pipeline, especially those sections in discontinuous permafrost or near the compressor stations. The ground temperature field in response to the operation of a proposed chilled gas pipeline traversing permafrost regions in Alaska was simulated by a pipe-soil thermal interaction geothermal model. Frost heave mitigation measures, including insulation around the pipe, flat slab insulation under the pipe, and heating cables combined with slab insulation, were evaluated for chilled pipeline operation in seasonally varying ambient temperatures. The numerical results show that the minimum temperature of the observation point at 2.5 m below the pipe bottom increases by 17%, 29%, and 48% when the thermal conductivity of the outer insulation layer is 0.1, 0.05, and 0.02 W/(m·K), respectively. For flat slab insulation, the thermal field is less sensitive to varying slab thicknesses than to varying thermal conductivity, implying the thermal conductivity, not the thickness, is the crucial factor. Additionally, the heat flow could be redirected from vertical to horizontal by flat slab insulation. The electrical heating cables could be regarded as a new heat source to balance the heat removal rate of the soil around the chilled pipe. The minimum temperature of the observation point at 1.1 m below the bottom of the pipe increases from −15.2 °C to −3.0, 1.5, and 7.5 °C, corresponding to the heating cable power of 20, 30, and 40 W, respectively, with the power of 30 W deemed appropriate for the study case. It is concluded that heating cables in combination with insulation slabs could be adopted to regulate the temperature field around the chilled pipeline efficiently and economically. The advantages of this combination include redirecting the heat flow and eliminating frost in the soil underlying the pipe. These approaches could be considered for applications in gas pipeline projects in arctic and alpine/high-plateau permafrost regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score0.572

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.147
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch in Cold and Arid RegionsSame topicClimate change and permafrostFrench-language works237,207