Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Homeric epics show us a society in which trickery had an important place among the martial virtues celebrated by the poet. The figure of Odysseus, the epitome of metis or cunning, stands at the head of European literature. But it would be a mistake to conclude that the idea of fairness was foreign to Greek culture. The development of organised sport, pioneered by the Greeks, would be inconceivable without rules of fair play, and we find comparable ideas in Greek tragedy and rhetoric in the classical period. The greatest Greek philosophers put fairness at the heart of their analyses of the concept of justice. There was never, however, a cult of fair play in ancient Greece comparable to that which we find in Rome in the 1st century bce, when Virgil and Livy in particular placed the rejection of trickery near the centre of the constellation of virtues that distinguished the Romans from the Carthaginians and the Greeks. There was little or no basis for such smugness in real life, yet the ideal was to prove an enduring one.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.175 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".