MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311481177 · doi:10.46747/cfp.6812885

Prescribing for common complications of spinal cord injury

2022· article· en· W4311481177 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Mary Ann McColl, Shikha Gupta, Alexander McColl, Karen Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Family Physician · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Cord Injury Research
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersRick Hansen Foundation
KeywordsMedicineMedical prescriptionSpasticityPolypharmacySpinal cord injuryPopulationGabapentinIntensive care medicinePhysical therapyAlternative medicineSpinal cordNursingPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To describe prescribing patterns for 3 common complications associated with spinal cord injury (SCI) and to provide family doctors with strategies for optimizing the care of patients with SCI. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: Results of a nationwide survey of prescription medication use among people with SCI in Canada and a longitudinal study of secondary complications associated with SCI. MAIN MESSAGE: Altered neurologic and cardiometabolic function in patients with SCI make it difficult for family physicians to predict optimal medication regimens for these patients. Three common problems seen in primary care among patients with SCI that require pharmacologic treatment are pain (treated in 57% of survey respondents), muscle spasms (54%), and recurrent urinary tract infections (43%). Pain management may require multiple medications, depending on the source or nature of the pain. Some prescription medications recommended for treating pain may be underused in this population, such as amitriptyline, while others may be overused in this population, such as antibiotics for urinary tract infections. Spasticity is often related to an underlying problem such as pain, and treatment of concomitant conditions may also reduce spasticity. Short-acting benzodiazepines were found to have been prescribed for spasticity outside the recommended treatment paradigm at a surprisingly high rate. The longitudinal study of secondary complications associated with SCI led to the development of Actionable Nuggets, an innovative knowledge translation tool for primary care providers. CONCLUSION: To provide optimal treatment to patients with SCI, family doctors are encouraged to engage in open communication with them about prescription medications, including aspects of cost, polypharmacy, and therapeutic substitutions. Family physicians should also explore interprofessional collaboration with SCI specialists and allied health providers to provide patients with nonpharmacologic strategies tailored to their activity levels and nutritional needs. The Actionable Nuggets mobile app provides family doctors with brief, actionable, evidence-based information on the top 20 health concerns associated with SCI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.630
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Family PhysicianSame topicSpinal Cord Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207