Bibliographic record
Abstract
This review article describes the current status of data archiving and computational infrastructure in the field of genomic medicine, focusing primarily on the situation in Japan. I begin by introducing the status of supercomputer operations in Japan, where a high-performance computing infrastructure (HPCI) is operated to meet the diverse computational needs of science in general. Since this HPCI consists of supercomputers of various architectures located across the nation connected via a high-speed network, including supercomputers specialized in genome science, the status of its response to the explosive increase in genomic data, including the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC) data archive, is explored. Separately, since it is clear that the use of commercial cloud computing environments needs to be promoted, both in light of the rapid increase in computing demands and to support international data sharing and international data analysis projects, I explain how the Japanese government has established a series of guidelines for the use of cloud computing based on its cybersecurity strategy and has begun to build a government cloud for government agencies. I will also carefully consider several other issues of user concern. Finally, I will show how Japan's major cloud computing infrastructure is currently evolving toward a multicloud and hybrid cloud configuration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".