MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311496553 · doi:10.1364/ome.477107

Hyperbolic metamaterial structures based on graphene for THz super-resolution imaging applications

2022· article· en· W4311496553 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOptical Materials Express · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersState Key Laboratory of Millimeter WavesChina Scholarship CouncilChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTerahertz radiationMetamaterialMaterials scienceGrapheneOpticsPlanarImage resolutionDiffractionOptoelectronicsDielectricPhysicsNanotechnologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The diffraction limit of light due to the loss of evanescent waves that carry high spatial frequency information in the far field restricts the practical applications of terahertz imaging technology. In order to break the diffraction limit, we investigate the super-resolution capability of different types of multilayered graphene-dielectric hyperbolic metamaterials. A super-resolution of λ/10 is achieved for both the cylindrical and planar structures. A prominent advantage of graphene-dielectric hyperbolic structures is the dynamic tunability of the dispersion and super-resolution performance by adjusting the chemical potential of graphene through conveniently changing the gate voltage without modifying the geometry of the hyperbolic structures. Furthermore, we have investigated the influence of bilayer thickness variations on the super-resolution performance. Finally, we apply the planar hyperbolic structures for the super-resolution imaging and a roughly five-fold lateral resolution enhancement is realized in our approach. Due to many prominent advantages including super-resolution over broad spectral range, dynamic tunability, good stability and robustness, we believe this work could contribute to the improvement of the resolutions of terahertz imaging systems and the development of hyperbolic metamaterial modulation devices in the terahertz band.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it