MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311537812 · doi:10.1093/jbi/wbac010

Breast Involvement in Ochronosis

2022· article· en· W4311537812 on OpenAlexaff
Gloria Palazuelos, Vanessa Murad

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Breast Imaging · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSalivary Gland Disorders and Functions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOchronosisMedicineDermatology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 66-year-old female presented with a palpable mass in her left breast. Physical examination revealed hard and irregular breasts with a non-mobile mass in the left upper inner quadrant. Diagnostic mammography (Figure 1) showed, as the most relevant and concerning finding, an irregular, spiculated, high-density mass in the upper inner left breast at the site of the palpable mass. Additional extensive bilateral irregular coarse calcifications with diffuse and symmetric distribution in an uncommon cobblestone-like pattern were found. US (Figure 2) showed an irregular mass with spiculated margins and heterogeneous echogenicity. US also demonstrated diffuse dystrophic calcifications producing significant posterior acoustic shadowing. A biopsy of the irregular mass was performed, confirming the diagnosis of invasive lobular carcinoma. Left breast lumpectomy was performed with US-guided localization of the mass. The surgical specimen, in addition to the primary tumor, showed diffuse dark patchy hyperpigmentation distributed throughout the breast parenchyma (Figure 3). Histological evaluation demonstrated multiple rounded brown ochronotic deposits in the connective tissue. With these findings, focused clinical examination noted dark hyperpigmentation of the bilateral sclera, auricles, and nails (Figure 4), which are typical clinical manifestations of ochronosis. Bilateral craniocaudal (A), mediolateral oblique (B), and mediolateral oblique spot compression views (C) show extensive bilateral irregular coarse calcifications with diffuse and symmetric distribution in an uncommon cobblestone-like pattern. In the upper inner quadrant of the left breast, at the site of the palpable area, an irregular, spiculated, high-density mass is observed (arrow), corresponding to the biopsy-proven invasive lobular carcinoma. US images of the right (A) and left breast (B) demonstrate diffuse dystrophic calcifications producing significant posterior acoustic shadowing. In the left upper inner quadrant (C), an irregular mass (arrows) with spiculated margins and heterogeneous echogenicity is identified. This was assessed as BI-RADS category 5, and subsequent biopsy showed invasive lobular carcinoma. Left lumpectomy surgical specimen. Primary tumor resection specimen (left) and a piece of normal mammary tissue (right) from a different location show dark patchy hyperpigmentation (arrows) from ochronosis pigments in the breast. Other typical clinical manifestations of ochronosis in our patient included hyperpigmentation secondary to ochronotic deposits in the sclera (Osler’s sign) (A) (arrow), auricle (B) (arrowhead), and nails (C) (asterisks). Ochronosis is a rare disorder resulting from alkaptonuria, an autosomal recessive abnormality of homogentisate oxidase enzyme function, which leads to the accumulation of homogentisic acid in fluids and tissues of the body. The accumulation of ochronotic pigments, as they are known, causes tissue damage with various clinical manifestations that are accentuated by the aging process. The most frequently affected tissues are connective tissue, hyaline cartilage, tendons, ligaments, and muscles. Breast manifestations include changes similar to those of fibrous mastopathy, such as dystrophic calcifications. Dark pigmented nipple secretions or breast milk are also seen. The accumulation of ochronotic pigment in the mammary stroma serves as a stimulus for the development of dystrophic calcifications. The typical appearance on mammography includes diffuse bilateral and symmetric coarse calcifications, which become more abundant as the aging process continues. There is no definitive treatment for this disease, which is progressive in most cases, and the prognosis varies according to the affected organs and severity. Specifically in the breast, the decision regarding conservative versus surgical management must be individualized and depends on whether the patient presents with pain, discomfort, or deformity. Special thanks to our dear patient, who from the beginning was interested in us sharing her case. None declared.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Breast ImagingSame topicSalivary Gland Disorders and FunctionsFrench-language works237,207