Impact of Anesthetic Exposures on the Neurocognitive Profiles of Pediatric Brain Tumor Survivors: A New Direction for Research and Multidisciplinary Collaboration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Primary brain tumors are the most commonly diagnosed solid tumors in children, and pediatric brain tumor survivors experience lasting, pervasive deficits of neurocognitive functioning. Repeated exposure to anesthetic drugs is a necessary component not only of surgical resection but also of multimodal cancer care for the youngest patients with brain tumors. The potential for anesthetic neurotoxicity to worsen neurocognitive outcomes in this vulnerable group, therefore, warrants our attention and further study through multi-disciplinary collaboration. This review discusses neurocognitive functioning in pediatric brain tumor survivors, highlighting the findings of a recent study of children with tumors of the posterior fossa which identified treatment-related risk factors for neurocognitive difficulties, with those undergoing multimodal therapies (eg, chemotherapy and irradiation) experiencing the greatest deficits compared with healthy controls. The role of anesthetic neurotoxicity in long-term outcomes among pediatric brain tumor survivors is also reviewed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".