Building predictive disease models using extracellular vesicle microscale flow cytometry and machine learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are highly abundant in human biofluids, containing a repertoire of macromolecules and biomarkers representative of the tissue of origin. EVs released by tumours can communicate key signals both locally and to distant sites to promote growth and survival or impact invasive and metastatic progression. Microscale flow cytometry of circulating EVs is an emerging technology that is a promising alternative to biopsy for disease diagnosis. However, biofluid-derived EVs are highly heterogeneous in size and composition, making their analysis complex. To address this, we developed a machine learning approach combined with EV microscale cytometry using tissue- and disease-specific biomarkers to generate predictive models. We demonstrate the utility of this novel extracellular vesicle machine learning analysis platform (EVMAP) to predict disease from patient samples by developing a blood test to identify high-grade prostate cancer and validate its performance in a prospective 215 patient cohort. Models generated using the EVMAP approach significantly improved the prediction of high-risk prostate cancer, highlighting the clinical utility of this diagnostic platform for improved cancer prediction from a blood test.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".