Capsule robot pose and mechanism state detection in ultrasound using attention-based hierarchical deep learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ingestible robotic capsules with locomotion capabilities and on-board sampling mechanism have great potential for non-invasive diagnostic and interventional use in the gastrointestinal tract. Real-time tracking of capsule location and operational state is necessary for clinical application, yet remains a significant challenge. To this end, we propose an approach that can simultaneously determine the mechanism state and in-plane 2D pose of millimeter capsule robots in an anatomically representative environment using ultrasound imaging. Our work proposes an attention-based hierarchical deep learning approach and adapts the success of transfer learning towards solving the multi-task tracking problem with limited dataset. To train the neural networks, we generate a representative dataset of a robotic capsule within ex-vivo porcine stomachs. Experimental results show that the accuracy of capsule state classification is 97%, and the mean estimation errors for orientation and centroid position are 2.0 degrees and 0.24 mm (1.7% of the capsule's body length) on the hold-out test set. Accurate detection of the capsule while manipulated by an external magnet in a porcine stomach and colon is also demonstrated. The results suggest our proposed method has the potential for advancing the wireless capsule-based technologies by providing accurate detection of capsule robots in clinical scenarios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".