MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311575271 · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-34995-y

A call for immediate action to increase COVID-19 vaccination uptake to prepare for the third pandemic winter

2022· article· en· W4311575271 on OpenAlexaff
Cornelia Betsch, Philipp Schmid, Pierre Verger, Stephan Lewandowsky, Anna Soveri, Ralph Hertwig, Angelo Fasce, Dawn Liu Holford, Paul De Raeve, Arnaud Gagneur, Pia Vuolanto, Tiago Correia, Lara Tavoschi, Silvia Declich, Maurizio Marceca, Athena Linos, Pania Karnaki, Linda C. Karlsson, Amanda Garrison

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersEuropean Commission
KeywordsPandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Context (archaeology)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakCall to actionSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Action (physics)VaccinationHealth careMEDLINEBusinessPublic relationsMedicinePolitical scienceMedical emergencyVirologyHistoryMarketingOutbreakDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This Comment piece summarises current challenges regarding routine vaccine uptake in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and provides recommendations on how to increase uptake. To implement these recommendations, the article points to evidence-based resources that can support health-care workers, policy makers and communicators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicVaccine Coverage and HesitancyFrench-language works237,207